The San Antonio Spurs walked out of Scotiabank Arena with a 110-107 win over the Toronto Raptors on February 25, 2026. It was not clean basketball. It was not dominant basketball either. But the Spurs had enough to survive a second-half surge from Toronto and pick up a gutsy road victory. De’Aaron Fox led San Antonio with 20 points, while Dylan Harper added 15 points, 7 assists, and played arguably the best two-way game on the floor. For Toronto, Immanuel Quickley’s 20-point effort off the bench was the lone real bright spot in a night the Raptors will want to move on from quickly. If you are searching for the full San Antonio Spurs vs Toronto Raptors match player stats, every number from February 25 is right here.
Table of contents
Final Score and Quarter by Quarter Breakdown
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Antonio Spurs | 30 | 27 | 21 | 32 | 110 |
| Toronto Raptors | 29 | 30 | 31 | 17 | 107 |
The third quarter belonged completely to the Raptors. Toronto outscored San Antonio 31 to 21 in that stretch, taking what looked like a comfortable lead into the fourth. Then the fourth happened, and the Spurs responded in the only way a team with real winning habits does: they outscored Toronto 32 to 17 to close the game out. That kind of fourth-quarter response does not happen by accident.
San Antonio Spurs Player Stats
Spurs Individual Performance Table
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | FT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| De’Aaron Fox | G | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8/15 (53.3%) | 2/5 | 2/8 | -11 |
| Dylan Harper | G | 15 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 7/11 (63.6%) | 1/4 | 0/2 | +1 |
| Stephon Castle | G | 13 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4/10 (40.0%) | 2/4 | 3/4 | +11 |
| Victor Wembanyama | C | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3/12 (25.0%) | 1/6 | 5/6 | +19 |
| Julian Champagnie | F | 10 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3/8 (37.5%) | 3/7 | 1/1 | +14 |
| Harrison Barnes | F | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3/5 (60.0%) | 2/4 | 0/0 | +1 |
| Luke Kornet | C-F | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2/4 (50.0%) | 0/0 | 2/2 | -9 |
| Carter Bryant | F | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 (50.0%) | 1/2 | 0/0 | -6 |
| Keldon Johnson | F-G | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1/6 (16.7%) | 0/1 | 0/0 | -7 |
Spurs Advanced Stats Snapshot
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Team FG% | 46.5% |
| Three Point% | 43.6% |
| Free Throw% | 56.5% |
| Total Assists | 28 |
| Total Steals | 11 |
| Total Blocks | 5 |
| Turnovers | 13 |
| Assist to Turnover Ratio | 2.15 |
| Points in Paint | 36 |
| Bench Points | 34 |
| Points off Turnovers | 15 |
| Fast Break Points | 12 |
| Second Chance Points | 11 |
| Effective FG% | 56.4% |
| True Shooting% | 57.2% |
| Offensive Rating | 106.67 |
| Defensive Rating | 104.00 |
| Biggest Lead | 7 |
| Rim FG% | 76.5% |
Toronto Raptors Player Stats
Raptors Individual Performance Table
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | FT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immanuel Quickley | G | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6/12 (50.0%) | 3/5 | 5/7 | +4 |
| Scottie Barnes | F | 15 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7/13 (53.8%) | 1/4 | 0/0 | -3 |
| Jakob Poeltl | C | 15 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5/11 (45.5%) | 0/0 | 5/5 | +18 |
| RJ Barrett | G | 12 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4/14 (28.6%) | 1/6 | 3/4 | -5 |
| Ja’Kobe Walter | G | 5 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1/4 (25.0%) | 0/2 | 3/3 | -6 |
| Collin Murray-Boyles | C | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1/4 (25.0%) | 1/1 | 1/2 | -18 |
| Sandro Mamukelashvili | F-C | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 (50.0%) | 0/0 | 0/0 | -13 |
| Jamison Battle | F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 (100%) | 0/0 | 0/0 | +1 |
Raptors Advanced Stats Snapshot
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Team FG% | 42.2% |
| Three Point% | 34.8% |
| Free Throw% | 85.2% |
| Total Assists | 17 |
| Total Steals | 6 |
| Total Blocks | 4 |
| Turnovers | 13 |
| Assist to Turnover Ratio | 1.42 |
| Points in Paint | 48 |
| Bench Points | 36 |
| Points off Turnovers | 23 |
| Fast Break Points | 16 |
| Second Chance Points | 7 |
| Effective FG% | 46.7% |
| True Shooting% | 52.5% |
| Offensive Rating | 104.00 |
| Defensive Rating | 106.67 |
| Biggest Lead | 15 |
| Rim FG% | 41.2% |
Head to Head Team Stats Comparison
| Stat Category | San Antonio Spurs | Toronto Raptors |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 110 | 107 |
| FG Made / Att | 40/86 | 38/90 |
| Field Goal% | 46.5% | 42.2% |
| 3PT Made / Att | 17/39 | 8/23 |
| Three Point% | 43.6% | 34.8% |
| Free Throws | 13/23 (56.5%) | 23/27 (85.2%) |
| Total Rebounds | 53 | 61 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 6 | 12 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 34 | 38 |
| Assists | 28 | 17 |
| Steals | 11 | 6 |
| Blocks | 5 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 13 |
| Points in Paint | 36 | 48 |
| Bench Points | 34 | 36 |
| True Shooting% | 57.2% | 52.5% |
| Rim FG% | 76.5% | 41.2% |
What Actually Decided This Game
The Three-Point Difference Was Massive
Look at those three-point numbers again. San Antonio shot 17 of 39 from deep (43.6%) while Toronto managed just 8 of 23 (34.8%). That is a 27-point swing from beyond the arc. Toronto had more possessions around the rim with 48 points in the paint compared to San Antonio’s 36, but the Spurs more than made up for it with their shooting. Julian Champagnie hit three of his seven attempts from deep. Harrison Barnes knocked down two of four. Even Victor Wembanyama, who had a frustrating shooting night overall, connected on one three.
The Spurs were built to shoot their way out of trouble, and that is exactly what happened in the fourth quarter.
Victor Wembanyama: Beyond the Box Score
Wembanyama finished with 12 points, 8 rebounds, 3 assists, and 5 blocks on a rough 3 of 12 shooting night. The box score will tell you he struggled. What it will not tell you is how his defensive presence warped the entire Raptors offense near the rim. Toronto shot just 41.2% at the rim for the game. Wembanyama’s +19 plus-minus was the best on either team, and that number tells the real story of what his presence means for San Antonio’s defense.
Five blocks in a single game is not just a stat. It is a message.
Dylan Harper’s Efficiency Stood Out
The rookie was 7 of 11 from the field (63.6%) with 15 points and 7 assists against just 1 turnover. His assist-to-turnover ratio of 7.0 for this game was elite. He attacked the paint aggressively, going 5 of 6 on attempts at the rim, and he made plays for his teammates consistently. At this stage of his development, performances like this one are starting to feel less surprising and more expected, which says everything about his trajectory.
De’Aaron Fox’s Free Throw Struggles
Fox led all scorers with 20 points on efficient 8 of 15 shooting, but he left real points on the table from the free throw line. He went 2 of 8 on free throws (25%), which is genuinely stunning for someone shooting at his volume. In a game decided by three points, those six missed free throws loom large. Had Fox converted at even an average rate, San Antonio would have won this more comfortably. The Spurs won anyway, but that number is worth keeping an eye on going forward.
Toronto’s Fourth Quarter Collapse
The Raptors built a lead, protected it through three quarters, and then completely fell apart. Scoring only 17 points in the fourth quarter while San Antonio dropped 32 is the kind of collapse that ends up on coaching film for weeks. Toronto finished with 13 turnovers and only 17 assists for the game, and their ball movement just vanished in the fourth. Scottie Barnes had 5 turnovers on the night, more than anyone else on the floor.
The Raptors had the game. They gave it away.
Key Individual Storylines
Immanuel Quickley: The Bright Spot
Quickley was outstanding off the bench. 20 points, 4 rebounds, 6 of 12 shooting, 3 of 5 from three. His +4 plus-minus made him one of only a few Raptors players who ended the game in positive territory. Toronto needs more of this consistency from him as they navigate a season that has had its share of bumps. His 66.3% true shooting percentage for this game was the best on the Raptors.
Jakob Poeltl’s Paint Dominance
Poeltl gave Toronto real production inside: 15 points, 7 rebounds, 3 blocks, 5 of 5 from the free throw line. His +18 plus-minus was the best on the Raptors by a significant margin. When Poeltl was on the floor and engaged, Toronto looked like a functioning offensive unit. The problem was the players around him were inconsistent, and the team as a whole ran out of answers in the final eight minutes.
Scottie Barnes and the Turnover Problem
Barnes had the highlights: 15 points, 53.8% shooting, 3 steals. He also had 5 turnovers, which is simply too many for a lead player in a close game. Three of those turnovers came in high-leverage situations. For a player of Barnes’ caliber, this kind of turnover performance in a three-point loss is the exact difference between winning and losing.
Harrison Barnes: Quiet But Efficient
Three points. Three rebounds. Three steals. Two assists. Barnes shot 3 of 5 including 2 of 4 from three and was a +1 on the night. Nothing flashy. Everything useful. At this stage of his career, Barnes remains one of the more underrated two-way contributors in the Western Conference, and nights like this are why.
Game Context and What It Means
Where Both Teams Stand
This was a road win for San Antonio at Scotiabank Arena, which is never easy. The Spurs entered this game on a strong run, having won several games in the days surrounding this matchup. The win improved their standing in the Western Conference playoff race while handing Toronto yet another frustrating home defeat.
For the Raptors, the pattern of building leads and squandering them in the fourth quarter is becoming a concerning trend. Their 17-point effort in the fourth is not a one-off. Toronto has struggled to close games consistently all season, and this loss highlighted those issues once again.
What the Advanced Numbers Say
The True Shooting Percentage gap (57.2% for San Antonio vs 52.5% for Toronto) tells you everything about shot quality and efficiency for the night. San Antonio got better looks, made more of them, and their rim conversion rate of 76.5% vs Toronto’s 41.2% at the basket is simply not a competition. The Spurs attacked the basket with purpose and finished at an elite rate when they got there.
Toronto dominated the paint in terms of volume with 48 points in the paint, but it masked a deeper problem: their paint points came via brute force rather than clean creation. San Antonio’s 28 assists on 40 made field goals is the hallmark of a team playing connected basketball. Toronto’s 17 assists on 38 makes tells a different story.
For a complete breakdown of how these numbers stack up against other recent matchups, matchvsplayerstats.com has the full database of player and team performance data from across the NBA season.
Full Spurs vs Raptors Stat Comparison at a Glance
Shooting Efficiency Deep Dive
| Zone | SAS FG% | TOR FG% |
|---|---|---|
| At the Rim | 76.5% | 41.2% |
| Midrange | 41.7% | 40.0% |
| Three Pointers | 43.6% | 34.8% |
| Overall FG% | 46.5% | 42.2% |
| Effective FG% | 56.4% | 46.7% |
The rim conversion gap is the single biggest technical storyline in this game. San Antonio made 13 of 17 shots at the rim. Toronto made 7 of 17. When you are converting at the rim at that kind of differential, you do not have to win every other area to win the game.
Situational Scoring Breakdown
| Situation | SAS | TOR |
|---|---|---|
| Points off Turnovers | 15 | 23 |
| Fast Break Points | 12 | 16 |
| Second Chance Points | 11 | 7 |
| Points in Paint | 36 | 48 |
| Bench Points | 34 | 36 |
Toronto won the hustle metrics. More fast break points, more off turnovers, more paint points, more bench production. And they still lost. That is a credit to San Antonio’s shot quality and fourth-quarter execution, and it is a damning statement about Toronto’s inability to convert their advantages into a win.
Bottom Line
San Antonio Spurs 110, Toronto Raptors 107. A game that flipped three times, featured a combined 26 three-point attempts from San Antonio alone, and came down to a fourth quarter that the Spurs simply owned. Fox’s 20 points powered the offense. Wembanyama’s 5 blocks anchored the defense. Harper’s efficiency was the kind of performance that reinforces how bright the future looks in San Antonio.
Toronto will look back at this one and feel it. They had the lead. They had the better bench numbers, more fast break points, more points off turnovers. Quickley gave them everything he had. Poeltl was dominant inside. And yet, the Raptors walked off their own floor with a loss because their fourth quarter fell completely apart.
The full San Antonio Spurs vs Toronto Raptors match player stats from February 25, 2026 paint the picture of a Spurs team that knows how to win when it matters, and a Raptors team still searching for a way to close.
