The Orlando Magic secured a commanding 118-99 victory over the Milwaukee Bucks on February 9, 2026, with Anthony Black dropping 26 points and Desmond Bane adding 25 to lead the charge. Kevin Porter Jr. paced the Bucks with 28 points in the losing effort as Milwaukee’s three-game winning streak came to an abrupt halt at the Kia Center.
This milwaukee bucks vs orlando magic match player stats breakdown reveals a tale of two halves, with Orlando catching fire after the break to pull away from a Bucks squad still searching for answers without Giannis Antetokounmpo.
Table of contents
- Final Score and Quarter Breakdown
- Top Performers: Orlando Magic
- Top Performers: Milwaukee Bucks
- Complete Magic Player Statistics
- Complete Bucks Player Statistics
- Team Statistics Comparison
- Key Statistical Takeaways
- Game Context and Playoff Implications
- Looking Ahead: Immediate Rematch
- Jalen Suggs’ Playmaking Excellence
- Paolo Banchero’s Quiet Contribution
- Milwaukee’s Depth Issues Exposed
- The Third Quarter Collapse
- Free Throw Mastery
- Defensive Intensity Difference
- Wagner’s Impact on Return
- Statistical Context
Final Score and Quarter Breakdown
| Quarter | Orlando Magic | Milwaukee Bucks |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | 27 | 22 |
| 2nd | 24 | 32 |
| 3rd | 36 | 20 |
| 4th | 31 | 25 |
| Final | 118 | 99 |
The third quarter proved decisive, with Orlando outscoring Milwaukee 36-20 to essentially put the game away. The Magic entered halftime trailing 54-51 but came out with renewed energy in the second half.
Top Performers: Orlando Magic
Anthony Black Stats
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 26 |
| Field Goals | 8-13 (61.5%) |
| Three Pointers | 2-6 (33.3%) |
| Free Throws | 8-9 (88.9%) |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | +13 |
Anthony Black put together a masterful performance, attacking the basket relentlessly and getting to the free-throw line nine times. His efficiency from the field and the charity stripe kept Milwaukee’s defense on their heels all night.
Desmond Bane Stats
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 25 |
| Field Goals | 8-11 (72.7%) |
| Three Pointers | 2-5 (40.0%) |
| Free Throws | 7-7 (100.0%) |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Steals | 0 |
| Blocks | 0 |
| Plus/Minus | +9 |
Bane was surgical, shooting an impressive 72.7% from the field and perfect from the line. His scoring punch gave Orlando a consistent offensive threat throughout the contest.
Franz Wagner Returns
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 14 |
| Field Goals | 6-10 (60.0%) |
| Three Pointers | 2-4 (50.0%) |
| Rebounds | 2 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Plus/Minus | +7 |
Franz Wagner made his return after missing nine consecutive games with an ankle injury, and his impact was immediate. Wagner knocked down 60% of his shots and distributed the ball well with five assists.
“Yeah, I thought we were a little bit crisper on the defensive side, and we’re finally able to make some shots,” Wagner said after the game. “I think, I thought we got a lot of good looks on the front side that just didn’t go in. So, I thought overall, pretty consistent game for us.”
When asked about the Magic’s ceiling with the roster getting healthy, Wagner’s confidence was clear: “I think the sky’s the limit. Obviously, the season hasn’t gone, you know, the way we envisioned before.”
Top Performers: Milwaukee Bucks
Kevin Porter Jr. Stats
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 28 |
| Field Goals | 10-19 (52.6%) |
| Three Pointers | 1-5 (20.0%) |
| Free Throws | 7-7 (100.0%) |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 7 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 3 |
| Plus/Minus | -21 |
Porter Jr. gave Milwaukee everything he had, knocking down 10 field goals and creating for teammates with seven assists. But his 28 points weren’t nearly enough to offset Orlando’s balanced attack.
Before the game, Porter had expressed optimism about the Bucks’ recent run: “It feels good. We haven’t had this feeling and been in this situation as much this year as we wanted.”
AJ Green Stats
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 15 |
| Field Goals | 4-8 (50.0%) |
| Three Pointers | 4-8 (50.0%) |
| Free Throws | 3-3 (100.0%) |
| Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | -13 |
Green provided a spark off the bench, drilling four triples and grabbing six boards. His three-point shooting kept Milwaukee within striking distance during stretches.
Ryan Rollins Stats
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 14 |
| Field Goals | 6-16 (37.5%) |
| Three Pointers | 2-6 (33.3%) |
| Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Turnovers | 6 |
| Plus/Minus | -11 |
Rollins struggled with efficiency and ball security, coughing up six turnovers that fueled Orlando’s transition game.
Complete Magic Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desmond Bane | 30 | 25 | 8-11 | 2-5 | 7-7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +9 |
| Anthony Black | 31 | 26 | 8-13 | 2-6 | 8-9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +13 |
| Franz Wagner | 27 | 14 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +7 |
| Paolo Banchero | 34 | 11 | 3-10 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +14 |
| Moritz Wagner | 21 | 14 | 5-8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +21 |
| Jalen Suggs | 30 | 7 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | +9 |
| Wendell Carter Jr. | 25 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| Tristan da Silva | 17 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +15 |
Complete Bucks Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Porter Jr. | 35 | 28 | 10-19 | 1-5 | 7-7 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -21 |
| AJ Green | 29 | 15 | 4-8 | 4-8 | 3-3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -13 |
| Ryan Rollins | 29 | 14 | 6-16 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -11 |
| Bobby Portis | 16 | 10 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -12 |
| Jericho Sims | 24 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -9 |
| Pete Nance | 10 | 5 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 |
| Cam Thomas | 11 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 |
| Kyle Kuzma | 16 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -13 |
Team Statistics Comparison
| Category | Orlando Magic | Milwaukee Bucks |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goal % | 46.5% (40-86) | 46.8% (36-77) |
| Three Point % | 33.3% (14-42) | 36.4% (12-33) |
| Free Throw % | 88.9% (24-27) | 71.4% (15-21) |
| Total Rebounds | 52 | 45 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 11 | 6 |
| Assists | 27 | 17 |
| Steals | 14 | 7 |
| Blocks | 3 | 6 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 20 |
| Points Off Turnovers | 27 | 10 |
| Fast Break Points | 19 | 7 |
| Points in Paint | 42 | 32 |
| Bench Points | 45 | 26 |
Key Statistical Takeaways
Turnover Differential Decides Game
The magic’s ability to protect the basketball proved crucial. Orlando committed just 11 turnovers compared to Milwaukee’s 20 giveaways. The home team converted those mistakes into 27 points off turnovers, compared to just 10 for the Bucks.
Magic Dominate Transition
Orlando thrived in the open court, scoring 19 fast break points compared to Milwaukee’s seven. The Magic’s defensive pressure created easy baskets on the other end.
Assist Advantage
The ball movement disparity tells the story. Orlando registered 27 assists on 40 made field goals, while Milwaukee managed just 17 assists on 36 makes. The Magic’s offensive flow was clearly superior.
Bench Production Gap
Orlando’s second unit outscored Milwaukee’s reserves 45-26. Moritz Wagner led the bench with 14 points on 5-8 shooting, providing crucial energy.
Rebounding Edge
The Magic controlled the glass 52-45, including a significant 11-6 advantage on the offensive boards. Those extra possessions led to 10 second-chance points.
Game Context and Playoff Implications
This matchup represented the first meeting between these Eastern Conference rivals this season. The victory pushed Orlando to 28-24 overall and 17-8 at home, strengthening their grip on seventh place in the conference standings.
For Milwaukee, the loss dropped them to 21-30 and 9-18 on the road. The Bucks remain stuck in the play-in tournament zone, now six games under .500 and desperately needing Giannis Antetokounmpo to return from his calf injury.
Doc Rivers had been optimistic about the team’s momentum heading into Orlando after wins over Chicago, New Orleans, and Indiana. “I made that comment 100 years ago: winning is like a deodorant. It covers a lot of things that stink at times,” Rivers said before the game. “When you start winning games, the ball goes in, you feel better, you want to come to practice. When you lose games, you dread watching film, everything is a big deal, the shots get tighter. Now you can see our guys are playing loose, they’re playing free. It’s nice.”
But the Magic had other plans, especially with Wagner back in the lineup.
Looking Ahead: Immediate Rematch
The teams didn’t have long to wait for round two. They met again on February 11, 2026, just two nights later, also in Orlando. With Wagner regaining his rhythm and the Magic finding their defensive identity, Milwaukee faced an uphill battle trying to split the home-and-home series.
The Bucks desperately needed Antetokounmpo back. Rivers acknowledged the star’s importance: “He’s gonna play when he’s healthy, we just gotta make sure he’s healthy. He’s getting close. Like, he’s working out, he looks good. So, I would say hopefully sooner than later.”
For complete basketball coverage and detailed player statistics from games throughout the season, visit Match vs Player Stats.
Jalen Suggs’ Playmaking Excellence
While Jalen Suggs didn’t fill up the scoring column with just seven points, his facilitation was outstanding. The guard dished out 10 assists while swiping five steals, disrupting Milwaukee’s offensive rhythm all night. His career-high against Milwaukee in December 2024 was 32 points, showing his versatility as both scorer and distributor.
Paolo Banchero’s Quiet Contribution
Paolo Banchero had a relatively quiet night by his standards with 11 points on 3-10 shooting. However, he pulled down nine rebounds and contributed three assists. His +14 plus/minus rating demonstrated his impact beyond the box score, as Orlando outscored Milwaukee by 14 points with him on the floor.
Milwaukee’s Depth Issues Exposed
Without Giannis anchoring the lineup, Milwaukee’s lack of scoring depth became glaring. Beyond Porter Jr.’s 28 points, no other Buck reached 16 points. The offense lacked a second reliable scoring option, making life easier for Orlando’s defense.
Kyle Kuzma’s struggles epitomized Milwaukee’s night. The forward managed just three points on 1-3 shooting while turning the ball over five times in 16 minutes. His minus-13 rating reflected how the Bucks struggled when he was on the court.
The Third Quarter Collapse
Milwaukee entered halftime with a 54-51 lead, looking poised to extend their winning streak to four games. But the third quarter belonged entirely to Orlando. The Magic exploded for 36 points while holding Milwaukee to just 20, creating a 16-point swing that essentially ended the competitive portion of the game.
During that decisive frame, Orlando shot 57.1% from the field and dominated the paint, outscoring Milwaukee 16-6 in the restricted area. The defensive intensity ramped up, forcing six Bucks turnovers in the quarter alone.
Free Throw Mastery
Orlando’s precision from the charity stripe proved vital. The Magic converted 24 of 27 free throws for an impressive 88.9% clip. Black (8-9) and Bane (7-7) were particularly clutch, hitting crucial free throws down the stretch to maintain the lead.
Milwaukee shot a respectable 71.4% from the line, but only attempted 21 free throws compared to Orlando’s 27. The Magic’s aggressive drives to the basket drew more fouls and created easier scoring opportunities.
Defensive Intensity Difference
The statistical comparison shows Orlando’s defensive superiority. The Magic forced 20 turnovers, collected 14 steals, and created havoc in passing lanes all night. Milwaukee’s offense struggled to find any rhythm against Orlando’s switching defense and active hands.
Orlando’s defensive rating of 98.8 compared to Milwaukee’s 120.6 offensive rating revealed how effectively the Magic contained the Bucks’ attack. Conversely, Orlando’s offensive rating of 120.6 demonstrated how efficiently they scored against Milwaukee’s porous defense.
Wagner’s Impact on Return
Franz Wagner’s return cannot be overstated. Beyond his 14 points and five assists, his presence opened up the floor for teammates. Defenses had to account for another capable scorer and playmaker, allowing Black and Bane more space to operate.
The chemistry looked rusty at times during the first half, but Wagner’s conditioning and decision-making improved as the game progressed. His second-half performance hinted at better things to come as he works back into game shape.
Statistical Context
This milwaukee bucks vs orlando magic match player stats showcase highlights several key trends. Orlando now rides a three-game winning streak after this victory, their longest since early December. The balanced scoring attack and defensive intensity suggest the Magic are rounding into form at the right time.
Milwaukee’s defensive issues persist without Giannis. They’ve allowed 118.9 points per game over their last five contests, a troubling trend for a team fighting for playoff positioning. The Bucks need their defensive anchor back to have any hope of climbing the Eastern Conference standings.
The contrast in ball security was stark. Orlando values each possession, while Milwaukee’s careless passing led to easy transition opportunities for the Magic. In today’s NBA, the team that protects the basketball typically wins, and this game proved no exception.
Looking at the shooting splits, both teams shot similar percentages from the field and from three-point range. The difference came in shot quality, pace, and conversion of opportunities. Orlando took smarter shots, moved the ball better, and capitalized on mistakes more efficiently.
This comprehensive milwaukee bucks vs orlando magic match player stats breakdown reveals a Magic team hitting its stride while Milwaukee searches for answers in Giannis’s absence. The rematch on February 11 would test whether the Bucks could adjust or if Orlando would continue asserting dominance in the season series.
