Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats (Feb 20, 2026)

Washington Wizards 112, Indiana Pacers 105 — that is the final from Capital One Arena on February 20, 2026. Jarace Walker led the Pacers with 19 points and 14 rebounds in a losing effort, while Ben Sheppard chipped in 15. On the Washington side, Anthony Gill, Kadary Richmond, Jaden Hardy, and Bub Carrington each dropped 13 as the Wizards spread the scoring load and outlasted Indiana down the stretch. If you came here looking for a full breakdown of the Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards match player stats, you are in the right place.

Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Washington came out of halftime up by 10 and never fully surrendered the lead, even after Indiana clawed back in the third quarter.

The second quarter was the game. Washington outscored Indiana 33 to 23 in that stretch, building a cushion that Indiana could never fully erase. The Pacers won the second half 58 to 53, but the deficit was already done.

Indiana Pacers Player Stats

Here is every notable Pacers player from the February 20 game, with full shooting splits and key contributions.

Pacers Scoring Leaders

Pacers Shooting Splits

Walker’s night was a story of two halves in itself. He was 5-of-15 from the field and misfired on 6 of his 7 three-point tries, but he compensated by drawing fouls relentlessly and racking up a team-high 14 rebounds to go with 7 assists. That is a near triple-double in a loss, which says everything about how uneven Indiana’s performance was overall.

Sheppard was the lone Pacer who shot efficiently. He went 6-of-8 from the floor and 3-of-4 from three, adding 10 fast break points on the night. When the team needed a bucket, Sheppard was the cleanest option they had.

Washington Wizards Player Stats

Washington got production from everywhere. Seven different Wizards scored in double figures or close to it, and their bench outscored Indiana’s 59 to 48.

Wizards Scoring Leaders

Wizards Shooting Splits

Kadary Richmond and Anthony Gill were both outstanding. Richmond shot 71.4% from the floor and was absolutely dominant in the paint, going 5-of-6 at the rim. Gill did the same, hitting 5-of-8 two-point attempts and grabbing 8 rebounds while being a +3 on the night.

Vukcevic quietly had one of the more impressive stat lines in the game: 12 points, 5 steals, and a 71.4% shooting clip. Five steals from a center is not something you see often.

Team Stats Comparison

This is where the real story of the game lives.

The numbers do not lie. Indiana turned the ball over 23 times. Washington scored 30 points off those turnovers. That is the game, full stop. You can outrebound the opponent by 5, hit more threes, and shoot better from the free throw line, and still lose by 7 when you cough the ball up that many times.

Washington’s advantage in the paint was staggering: 56 paint points to Indiana’s 30. The Wizards attacked the basket relentlessly and converted at a 72% clip at the rim compared to Indiana’s 63.2%.

Andrew Nembhard’s 6 turnovers on just 7 field goal attempts tells you everything about how Indiana’s ball handling broke down, especially in ball screen coverage and in pick-and-roll situations where Washington’s guards forced errors repeatedly.

Advanced Stats Breakdown

For the analytics-minded fan, here is a look at efficiency and pace metrics.

Washington’s assist-to-turnover ratio of 3.0 versus Indiana’s 0.96 is a massive gap. The Wizards moved the ball cleanly and efficiently; Indiana was the exact opposite.

Indiana actually had a slightly better true shooting percentage (55.3% vs 52.4%), meaning when they did get clean looks, they converted. The problem was they consistently gave possessions back before they could make them count.

Game Context: What Was at Stake

Both teams are in the thick of lottery positioning discussions for the 2026 NBA Draft, which makes games like this carry extra weight in terms of development minutes and internal competition for spots on next year’s roster.

For Indiana, the Pacers came in having won their previous game against Brooklyn and were looking to build some consistency. The 23-turnover performance was a step back, particularly for a backcourt that has been trying to establish more reliable playmaking.

Washington entered this matchup at home and took full advantage of it. The Wizards have shown flashes of cohesion this season when role players like Gill and Richmond step up alongside their younger pieces, and February 20 was one of those nights.

This was the first of back-to-back games between these two teams, with another matchup scheduled for February 21 at the same venue. Based on what Indiana showed in terms of ball security, they had real work to do before tip-off the next night.

Player Performance Analysis

Jarace Walker was Indiana’s best player on the night even in a loss. A 19-point, 14-rebound, 7-assist showing with the foul-drawing ability to back it up (8-of-10 from the line) shows genuine growth from a young forward who is starting to own possessions rather than just react to them. The three-point shooting (1-of-7) is still a concern, but his floor impact was real. You can track more detailed Pacers player breakdowns and box score histories at matchvsplayerstats.com.

Tristan Vukcevic was Washington’s sneaky standout. Five steals from the center position is elite-level disruptiveness, and his 76.1% true shooting mark gave the Wizards clean, efficient possessions in a game where they needed to be careful about turning it over against Indiana’s occasional fast-break opportunities.

Andrew Nembhard had a tough night and it directly cost Indiana. Six turnovers while shooting 28.6% from the field meant his presence on the floor was a net negative in this particular game. His minus-9 plus-minus reflected that honestly.

Ben Sheppard was the opposite story for Indiana: clean, decisive, and efficient. His 93.8% effective field goal percentage is almost absurdly good for a 15-point night, and his 10 fast break points showed he was attacking at every opportunity.

Key Takeaways from the Pacers vs Wizards Box Score

• Washington dominated the paint 56 to 30, which was the single biggest factor in the outcome
• Indiana’s 23 turnovers led directly to 30 Washington points, a catastrophic ratio
• The Wizards’ bench outscored Indiana’s 59 to 48, proving this was a full-roster effort for Washington
• Vukcevic’s 5-steal performance from center was one of the most unusual individual defensive stat lines in this matchup
• Walker’s near-triple-double in a loss shows why Indiana continues to invest his development minutes
• Washington’s assist-to-turnover ratio of 3.0 reflected how composed they were under pressure
• Indiana’s fast break output (29 points) was actually higher than Washington’s (19), but it was not nearly enough to compensate for the turnover damage

Final Thoughts on the Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats

Washington earned this one. They were better organized, protected the ball far better, dominated inside scoring, and got contributions from eight different players. Indiana’s individual performances from Walker, Sheppard, and Huff were encouraging, but the team-wide inability to hold onto the ball made those bright spots irrelevant in the final score.

The Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards match player stats from February 20, 2026 tell a clear story: Washington won in the margins, specifically in turnovers and paint production, while Indiana’s shooting efficiency simply could not bridge a gap that was created in the second quarter and sustained through a damaging turnover differential all night.