Boston Celtics 111, Los Angeles Lakers 89. That’s the final. Jaylen Brown dropped 32 points, Payton Pritchard went nuclear off the bench with 30, and the Celtics dismantled a Laker squad that had no answer for Boston’s depth all night. If you’re here for the boston celtics vs los angeles lakers match player stats, you’re in the right place. Let’s get into everything.
Table of contents
- Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Recap
- Boston Celtics Individual Player Stats
- Los Angeles Lakers Individual Player Stats
- Team Stats Comparison
- Shooting Charts and Shot Selection
- Context: What Was Going On in This Game
- Payton Pritchard Was the Difference Maker
- Jaylen Brown’s All-Around Night
- Luka Doncic’s Night in Isolation
- Neemias Queta’s Quiet Double-Double
- Analysis: Why the Celtics Won Going Away
- What This Means for Both Teams
- Final Thoughts
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Recap
| Quarter | Lakers (LAL) | Celtics (BOS) |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 28 | 28 |
| Q2 | 22 | 32 |
| Q3 | 21 | 24 |
| Q4 | 18 | 27 |
| Final | 89 | 111 |
It was even after one quarter. Then Boston pulled the pin in the second. A 32-22 second quarter put the game on a different trajectory, and LA never found a way back. The Celtics’ biggest lead was 22 points.
Boston Celtics Individual Player Stats
The Celtics got contributions up and down the roster. Jaylen Brown led the way, but the real story was Payton Pritchard absolutely cooking from deep.
Celtics Scoring Leaders
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | 3P% | FT% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaylen Brown | F | 32 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 35.7% | 33.3% | 75.0% | +18 |
| Payton Pritchard | G | 30 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 71.4% | 66.7% | 100% | +21 |
| Derrick White | G | 12 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 38.5% | 33.3% | N/A | +18 |
| Neemias Queta | C | 10 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 80.0% | N/A | 100% | +5 |
| Nikola Vucevic | C | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% | N/A | 50.0% | +15 |
| Sam Hauser | F | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 33.3% | 100% | +5 |
| Baylor Scheierman | G | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 25.0% | N/A | +18 |
| Hugo Gonzalez | G | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% | N/A | N/A | +5 |
| Ron Harper Jr. | G-F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | N/A | N/A | +2 |
Celtics Advanced and Shooting Breakdown
| Player | True Shooting % | Effective FG% | Efficiency Rating | Offensive Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payton Pritchard | 95.2% | 92.9% | 33 | 151.4 |
| Neemias Queta | 85.0% | 80.0% | 24 | 139.5 |
| Jaylen Brown | 48.1% | 41.1% | 25 | 96.0 |
| Nikola Vucevic | 65.4% | 66.7% | 15 | 126.3 |
| Sam Hauser | 54.3% | 50.0% | 10 | 123.4 |
| Derrick White | 46.2% | 46.2% | 18 | 114.6 |
Pritchard’s 95.2% true shooting percentage in this game is just absurd. Six threes on nine attempts. He was not missing.
Los Angeles Lakers Individual Player Stats
Luka Doncic was the only Laker who showed up with real production. The rest of the roster combined for 64 points, and it wasn’t nearly enough.
Lakers Scoring Leaders
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | 3P% | FT% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luka Doncic | G | 25 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 40.9% | 57.1% | 50.0% | -21 |
| Austin Reaves | G | 15 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% | 25.0% | 85.7% | -14 |
| Rui Hachimura | F | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.6% | 25.0% | N/A | -13 |
| Jake LaRavia | F | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | N/A | N/A | -18 |
| Deandre Ayton | C | 4 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% | N/A | N/A | -15 |
| Jarred Vanderbilt | F | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 100% | N/A | -1 |
| Jaxson Hayes | C-F | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | N/A | N/A | -1 |
| Kobe Bufkin | G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | N/A | N/A | 0 |
| Marcus Smart | F | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0% | N/A | N/A | -4 |
Lakers Advanced Stats
| Player | True Shooting % | Effective FG% | Efficiency Rating | Offensive Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luka Doncic | 50.7% | 50.0% | 18 | 95.8 |
| Austin Reaves | 57.3% | 45.0% | 24 | 113.9 |
| Deandre Ayton | 33.3% | 33.3% | 5 | 76.7 |
| Rui Hachimura | 35.7% | 35.7% | 1 | 79.6 |
Team Stats Comparison
This is where the gap really shows up. It wasn’t just the scoring difference. The Celtics dominated in almost every single category that matters.
| Category | Lakers | Celtics |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 89 | 111 |
| Field Goal % | 39.1% | 48.2% |
| 3-Point % | 30.0% | 38.9% |
| Free Throw % | 66.7% | 81.0% |
| Total Rebounds | 47 | 61 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 8 | 9 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 31 | 41 |
| Assists | 18 | 29 |
| Steals | 7 | 6 |
| Blocks | 5 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 14 |
| Points in Paint | 42 | 48 |
| Bench Points | 25 | 45 |
| Second Chance Points | 6 | 17 |
| Points Off Turnovers | 20 | 6 |
| True Shooting % | 46.9% | 60.2% |
| Effective FG % | 44.3% | 56.6% |
| Offensive Rating | 93.8 | 114.2 |
| Defensive Rating | 114.2 | 93.8 |
Bench points tell the real story. Lakers got 25 from their bench. Celtics got 45. That’s a 20-point swing from players who don’t even start.
Shooting Charts and Shot Selection
Celtics Shot Zone Breakdown
| Zone | Made | Attempted | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| At the Rim | 13 | 18 | 72.2% |
| Mid-Range | 2 | 9 | 22.2% |
| Three-Pointers | 14 | 36 | 38.9% |
| Free Throws | 17 | 21 | 81.0% |
Lakers Shot Zone Breakdown
| Zone | Made | Attempted | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| At the Rim | 12 | 22 | 54.5% |
| Mid-Range | 4 | 11 | 36.4% |
| Three-Pointers | 9 | 30 | 30.0% |
| Free Throws | 12 | 18 | 66.7% |
Boston was 72.2% at the rim compared to LA’s 54.5%. They generated better looks, finished at a higher clip, and shot the three ball at nearly 9 percentage points better. That kind of efficiency gap over 48 minutes produces a 22-point blowout.
Context: What Was Going On in This Game
Going into February 22, the Celtics were riding solid form on their West Coast road trip. They had just beaten the Golden State Warriors two days prior. The Lakers were at home at Crypto.com Arena but brought very little energy out of that second quarter.
A few things that shaped this game:
- The second quarter swing. After a tied first quarter, Boston outscored LA 32-22 in Q2. That 10-point swing flipped the entire narrative of the game.
- Luka carried a heavy load. With 22 field goal attempts and only 3 assists, Doncic had to do everything himself. The supporting cast simply did not show up.
- Boston’s bench was a different level. Pritchard and Queta off the bench combined for 40 points and 16 rebounds. That’s starter production from reserve players.
- LA shot themselves out of it. Thirty attempts from three-point range at 30% is a recipe for disaster, especially when the other team converts 38.9% on 36 tries.
For the full historical context of this rivalry and where these teams stand in the NBA standings, NBA.com has the updated standings.
Payton Pritchard Was the Difference Maker
Let’s be direct about this. Jaylen Brown’s 32 points headlined the box score, but Pritchard’s performance off the bench was what buried the Lakers.
- 10/14 from the field
- 6/9 from three-point range
- 4/4 from the free throw line
- 8 assists and 4 rebounds
- 30 points, +21 in the plus-minus column
A 95.2% true shooting percentage and a 92.9% effective field goal percentage in an NBA game is elite-level efficiency by any measure. Pritchard has been one of the league’s most consistent scoring guards off the bench this season, and this performance was a signature one.
You can track stats like these across all matchups at matchvsplayerstats.com for a complete look at head-to-head player performance data.
Jaylen Brown’s All-Around Night
Brown’s 32-8-7 stat line reads like a triple double near-miss, and he was the engine that kept Boston’s offense running in the first half.
- 32 points on 28 field goal attempts
- 8 rebounds, 7 assists, 3 steals
- 9/12 from the free throw line
- +18 in 38 minutes
His 8.0 assists-to-opportunity ratio and ability to get to the line (8 fouls drawn) kept the Lakers’ defense scrambling all night. The volume was there, and even though his field goal percentage at 35.7% wasn’t his cleanest, the total production more than made up for it.
Luka Doncic’s Night in Isolation
Luka put up 25 points but the team lost by 22. The minus-21 on his plus-minus tells the real story.
- 25 points on 22 attempts
- 4/7 from three-point range (his only bright spot)
- Just 3 assists with 2 turnovers
- 50.0% from the free throw line on 6 attempts
His three-point shooting efficiency was 57.1%, which is legitimately elite. But with only 3 assists in a game where his team needed playmaking, LA’s offense stagnated whenever the ball wasn’t in his hands. The team’s assists-to-turnover ratio of 2.25 suggests some ball movement, but the overall offensive rating of 93.8 shows how ineffective they were per possession.
For more context on Doncic’s season stats and trends, Basketball Reference has the full splits.
Neemias Queta’s Quiet Double-Double
Queta did not dominate headlines, but he absolutely dominated the glass and the rim on both ends.
- 10 points on 5 attempts (80% FG)
- 12 rebounds (4 offensive, 8 defensive)
- 3 blocks in his minutes
- True shooting percentage of 85.0%
A double-double from the bench center with three blocks is exactly the kind of depth that separates championship-caliber rosters. His presence made LA uncomfortable finishing around the paint.
Analysis: Why the Celtics Won Going Away
Depth beat star power on this night. Luka Doncic is a premier player in this league. Austin Reaves added 15 solid points. But the gap between Boston’s second unit and LA’s reserves was the defining factor.
Key reasons Boston won this one:
- 45 bench points vs 25 is nearly impossible to overcome unless your starters are lighting it up.
- Rebounding margin of 61 to 47 gave Boston second-chance opportunities all game. The Celtics turned those into 17 second-chance points while LA managed only 6.
- Rim efficiency was night and day. Boston converted 72.2% at the rim. LA managed 54.5%. Better shot selection, better spacing, better interior finishing.
- Free throw disparity mattered late. LA shot 66.7% from the line on 18 attempts. Boston hit 81.0% on 21 attempts. Both teams got to the line a similar number of times, but Boston simply converted more of those points.
- Derrick White’s quiet masterclass. 12 points and 8 assists from the point guard position with just 1 turnover. That 8.0 assist-to-turnover ratio is elite facilitating in an NBA game.
The Lakers’ offensive rating of 93.8 per 100 possessions means they scored fewer than a point per trip. Against a locked-in Boston defense, that math never works out.
What This Means for Both Teams
For Boston, this was a business-trip win on a West Coast road swing. They’ve now shown they can beat opponents with size mismatches, bench depth, or backcourt firepower depending on what the game demands. The roster versatility is real.
For the Lakers, the bigger concern is the supporting cast around Doncic. Reaves gave you 15, but nobody else broke double figures. Ayton had 4 points on 6 shots. Hachimura went 2/7. When Luka is asked to carry this much offensive load on any given night, the ceiling is limited.
For updated NBA scores, game logs, and current team news, ESPN NBA remains a top source to stay current.
Final Thoughts
Boston Celtics vs Los Angeles Lakers match player stats on February 22, 2026 painted a clear picture: this was a team win for the Celtics built on bench production, rebounding dominance, and shooting efficiency. Pritchard’s 30-point explosion, Brown’s all-around effort, and Queta’s double-double off the bench made this one of Boston’s most complete performances on the road this season. LA got Luka’s best. It just wasn’t enough.
