If you came looking for the Phoenix Suns vs San Antonio Spurs match player stats from February 19, 2026, here is exactly what went down: San Antonio dominated from tip to buzzer, winning 121 to 94 at home, with Stephon Castle and Victor Wembanyama leading the charge while the Suns shot a miserable 37.1% from the field.
No close game. No dramatic comeback. Just a thorough, disciplined Spurs performance that exposed every weakness Phoenix has been dealing with this season.
Table of contents
- Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
- San Antonio Spurs Player Stats
- Phoenix Suns Player Stats
- Head-to-Head Team Stats Comparison
- The Wembanyama Effect: Controlling the Game Without Dominating the Box Score
- Stephon Castle Quietly Puts Together a Statement Game
- Jalen Green Was the Only Sun Who Showed Up
- Where the Suns Lost This Game
- Victor Wembanyama vs. Mark Williams: The Center Battle
- Castle and Harper: The Spurs Rookie Duo Is for Real
- Game Context: Where Both Teams Stand
- Final Thoughts
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The Spurs did not just win. They controlled every single quarter.
| Quarter | San Antonio Spurs | Phoenix Suns |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 30 | 25 |
| Q2 | 31 | 24 |
| Q3 | 37 | 22 |
| Q4 | 23 | 23 |
| FINAL | 121 | 94 |
The third quarter is where this game was completely buried. San Antonio outscored Phoenix 37 to 22 in that frame, turning what was already a sizable lead into an insurmountable gap. By the time the fourth quarter started, the result was a foregone conclusion.
San Antonio Spurs Player Stats
Top Performers at a Glance Stephon Castle: 20 PTS | Dylan Harper: 17 PTS | Victor Wembanyama: 17 PTS / 11 REB / 5 BLK
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | 3P% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephon Castle | G | 20 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% | 50.0% | +22 |
| Victor Wembanyama | C | 17 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 46.7% | 25.0% | +23 |
| Dylan Harper | G | 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 63.6% | 40.0% | +4 |
| Devin Vassell | F | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 55.6% | 40.0% | +17 |
| Luke Kornet | C | 10 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | N/A | +1 |
| Julian Champagnie | F | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% | 50.0% | +20 |
| Harrison Barnes | F | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 37.5% | 25.0% | +16 |
| Keldon Johnson | F | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 0.0% | +20 |
| Carter Bryant | F | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 50.0% | +4 |
| Bismack Biyombo | C | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | N/A | N/A | -4 |
Spurs Team Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Field Goal % | 51.7% |
| Three-Point % | 35.1% |
| Free Throw % | 90.0% |
| Points in the Paint | 48 |
| Fast Break Points | 25 |
| Second Chance Points | 14 |
| Assists | 30 |
| Turnovers | 12 |
| Bench Points | 49 |
| Biggest Lead | +32 |
| Effective FG% | 59.2% |
| True Shooting % | 63.2% |
| Offensive Rating | 125.0 |
| Defensive Rating | 92.5 |
Phoenix Suns Player Stats
Top Performers at a Glance Jalen Green: 26 PTS (team high) | Mark Williams: 11 PTS / 10 REB | Collin Gillespie: 8 AST
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | 3P% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Green | F | 26 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 47.8% | 44.4% | -20 |
| Mark Williams | C | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33.3% | N/A | -19 |
| Oso Ighodaro | F | 10 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 62.5% | N/A | -7 |
| Jordan Goodwin | G | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 28.6% | -27 |
| Royce O’Neale | F | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 37.5% | 40.0% | -18 |
| Collin Gillespie | G | 8 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 23.1% | 25.0% | -11 |
| Jamaree Bouyea | G | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 42.9% | 33.3% | -11 |
| Devin Booker | G | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 0.0% | -7 |
| Khaman Maluach | C | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% | 0.0% | -1 |
| Rasheer Fleming | F | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.0% | 50.0% | 0 |
| Amir Coffey | G | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | N/A | N/A | -7 |
Suns Team Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Field Goal % | 37.1% |
| Three-Point % | 28.6% |
| Free Throw % | 66.7% |
| Points in the Paint | 36 |
| Fast Break Points | 7 |
| Second Chance Points | 16 |
| Assists | 22 |
| Turnovers | 13 |
| Bench Points | 36 |
| Biggest Lead | +2 |
| Effective FG% | 42.9% |
| True Shooting % | 43.7% |
| Offensive Rating | 92.5 |
| Defensive Rating | 125.0 |
Head-to-Head Team Stats Comparison
| Category | San Antonio Spurs | Phoenix Suns |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 121 | 94 |
| FG Made / Att | 45 / 87 | 39 / 105 |
| Field Goal % | 51.7% | 37.1% |
| Three-Point % | 35.1% | 28.6% |
| Free Throw % | 90.0% | 66.7% |
| Total Rebounds | 55 | 58 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 11 | 19 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 39 | 27 |
| Assists | 30 | 22 |
| Blocks | 7 | 5 |
| Points in Paint | 48 | 36 |
| Fast Break Points | 25 | 7 |
| Bench Points | 49 | 36 |
| Biggest Lead | +32 | +2 |
| Offensive Rating | 125.0 | 92.5 |
| Defensive Rating | 92.5 | 125.0 |
The Wembanyama Effect: Controlling the Game Without Dominating the Box Score
Victor Wembanyama finished with 17 points, 11 rebounds, 4 assists, 1 steal, and 5 blocked shots. On paper that looks great, but what the box score misses is the sheer gravitational pull he had on the entire Suns offense.
Phoenix attempted 105 field goal attempts and converted only 39. A big chunk of that inefficiency traces back to Wembanyama altering drives, forcing pull-ups, and rotating at a speed that bigs simply should not have at 7 feet 4 inches. His defensive rating for this game sat at 73.9, which is extraordinary.
The 5 blocks do not even capture how many shots never got attempted because Suns players spotted him rotating. That deterrence is the invisible stat that never shows up in any traditional box score.
For deeper player stat comparisons across NBA matchups, matchvsplayerstats.com is worth bookmarking if you track this kind of data regularly.
Stephon Castle Quietly Puts Together a Statement Game
Castle going 8 of 11 from the field at 72.7% is the kind of line that gets overshadowed when your team wins by 27. It should not be.
He finished with 20 points, 4 assists, 3 steals, and a plus/minus of +22. His true shooting percentage came in at 84.2%, which ranks as one of the most efficient individual scoring performances of his young NBA career. Castle also knocked down 2 of 4 threes, went a perfect 2 of 2 from the free throw line, and generated 6 fast break points.
The Spurs ran fast breaks all night and Castle was central to initiating nearly every one. The two-time Rookie of the Year candidate is showing exactly why San Antonio selected him second overall.
Jalen Green Was the Only Sun Who Showed Up
Let us be honest about this. Jalen Green’s 26-point night on 47.8% shooting was genuinely impressive and completely meaningless in the context of this game.
He hit 4 of 9 threes, scored efficiently throughout, and added 3 steals. On another night, with more around him, that line wins games. But his plus/minus of -20 tells the full story of what was happening every time he was out there.
Devin Booker had one of the worst performances of his season: 5 points on 33.3% shooting, 0 assists, and a -7 rating. The Suns’ offense ran through Green almost exclusively in the second half, San Antonio knew it, schemed for it, and still held Phoenix to 94.
Where the Suns Lost This Game
This was not a close game that slipped away late. It was a structural breakdown across multiple areas.
Shooting volume vs. efficiency gap: Phoenix took 105 field goal attempts and made only 39. The Spurs took 87 and made 45. Volume does not matter when the efficiency gap is this wide. Phoenix was taking more shots and scoring fewer points than the opponent.
Free throw disparity: San Antonio went 18 of 20 from the line at 90.0%. Phoenix went 4 of 6 at 66.7%. The Spurs got to the line more often and knocked them down when it counted.
Fast break domination: Spurs scored 25 fast break points. Suns scored 7. That 18-point fast break gap alone nearly accounts for the final margin. Turning the ball over 13 times against a team with Wembanyama and Castle in transition is a recipe for exactly this kind of result.
Bench depth: San Antonio’s reserve unit scored 49 points. Phoenix’s bench added 36. Luke Kornet came off the pine and shot a perfect 5 of 5 from the field for 10 points with 9 rebounds. That level of bench production from a team’s third or fourth big is the kind of depth that separates contenders from pretenders.
Victor Wembanyama vs. Mark Williams: The Center Battle
This matchup had direct consequences on how both teams performed across the entire game.
| Category | Victor Wembanyama | Mark Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 17 | 11 |
| Rebounds | 11 | 10 |
| Blocks | 5 | 1 |
| FG% | 46.7% | 33.3% |
| Plus/Minus | +23 | -19 |
| Defensive Rating | 73.9 | 125.4 |
Williams had a double-double in a losing effort, which is something. But the plus/minus split, +23 against -19, is a 42-point swing that tells you almost everything about how the center position shaped this game on both ends of the floor.
Castle and Harper: The Spurs Rookie Duo Is for Real
One of the most interesting subplots of the 2025-26 NBA season is watching Stephon Castle and Dylan Harper develop simultaneously in San Antonio. This game added another entry to that developing record.
| Metric | Castle | Harper |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 20 | 17 |
| FG% | 72.7% | 63.6% |
| 3P% | 50.0% | 40.0% |
| Assists | 4 | 1 |
| Steals | 3 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 3 |
| True Shooting % | 84.2% | 71.5% |
Combined they went 15 of 22 from the field for 37 points. Both showed composure, clean shot selection, and the ability to find their spots against professional NBA defense. San Antonio has something genuinely special developing here, and performances like this confirm it.
Game Context: Where Both Teams Stand
San Antonio entered this game continuing to grow around Wembanyama’s second full NBA season. The Spurs are not yet a locked-in playoff team, but they are playing with cohesion that makes them genuinely dangerous at home. Their blend of elite shot-blocking, transition offense, and two capable rookie contributors gives them a profile unlike most teams in this stage of a rebuild.
Phoenix is going through a difficult stretch. The Jalen Green addition brought real scoring punch, but the team’s shooting efficiency numbers remain a problem. A 37.1% field goal night is not a one-time accident this season. The biggest lead Phoenix held in this entire game was 2 points, and that came early in the first quarter before San Antonio found its groove.
The Spurs’ biggest lead reached 32. That single number describes this game more accurately than almost anything else.
Final Thoughts
The Phoenix Suns vs San Antonio Spurs match player stats from February 19, 2026 paint a picture that is hard to spin in any other direction. San Antonio was the better team in every meaningful category: shooting efficiency, defensive execution, bench depth, transition scoring, and interior dominance.
Wembanyama, Castle, and Harper are becoming one of the most compelling young trios in the NBA. The Suns need Booker back in form and the supporting cast to close the efficiency gap fast if they want to stay relevant in a loaded Western Conference.
Final: San Antonio Spurs 121, Phoenix Suns 94.
For more in-depth NBA player stat comparisons and match breakdowns, visit matchvsplayerstats.com.
