The chicago bulls vs boston celtics match player stats from their February 11, 2026 encounter tells a one-sided story. Boston dismantled Chicago 124-105 at TD Garden, with Payton Pritchard leading the charge with 26 points while Jaylen Brown added 24. For the Bulls, Rob Dillingham put up 16 points and seven assists, while Matas Buzelis contributed 15 points and eight rebounds in the losing effort.
Table of contents
Game Overview: Celtics Dominate Before All-Star Break
Wednesday night’s matchup marked the final game before the All-Star break for both squads. The Boston Celtics rolled past the Chicago Bulls 124-105, with the Celtics winning six of their last seven games. Boston’s performance was clinical from the opening tip, building a commanding 72-44 halftime advantage.
The game featured an intriguing storyline as Nikola Vucevic and Chicago’s Anfernee Simons played against their former teams for the first time since being swapped in a trade deadline deal. Vucevic excelled in his homecoming revenge game, while Simons struggled to find his rhythm.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring
| Quarter | Bulls | Celtics |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | 27 | 36 |
| 2nd | 17 | 36 |
| 3rd | 26 | 26 |
| 4th | 35 | 26 |
| Final | 105 | 124 |
Boston’s second quarter explosion defined the contest. The Celtics outscored Chicago 36-17 in the period, turning a competitive game into a blowout. The Bulls showed some fight in the fourth quarter, outscoring Boston 35-26, but the deficit proved insurmountable.
Top Performers: Individual Player Stats
Boston Celtics Leading Scorers
Payton Pritchard delivered his most efficient performance of the recent stretch:
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 26 |
| FG | 11-18 (61.1%) |
| 3PT | 3-8 (37.5%) |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 8 |
| Turnovers | 5 |
Payton Pritchard absolutely took over the end of the first quarter, setting the tone for Boston’s dominance. His ability to attack the basket and create for others kept Chicago’s defense scrambling throughout the night.
Jaylen Brown was aggressive from the opening tip:
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 24 |
| FG | 9-20 (45.0%) |
| 3PT | 2-9 (22.2%) |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Free Throws | 4-4 (100%) |
Brown’s 18 first-half points helped Boston establish their comfortable cushion. His scoring was fueled by frustration, it seemed, as late in the second quarter, it looked like Brown was upset with the officials.
Nikola Vucevic punished his former team with precision:
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 19 |
| FG | 7-12 (58.3%) |
| 3PT | 4-5 (80.0%) |
| Rebounds | 11 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Double-Double | Yes |
It was Vucevic’s second double-double in three games with the Celtics. His performance showcased why Boston targeted him at the deadline.
Chicago Bulls Top Contributors
Rob Dillingham carried the offensive load for the short-handed Bulls:
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 16 |
| FG | 6-12 (50.0%) |
| Free Throws | 4-5 (80.0%) |
| Rebounds | 1 |
| Assists | 7 |
| Steals | 3 |
Dillingham’s playmaking kept Chicago competitive in spurts, but the Bulls lacked the firepower to match Boston’s depth.
Matas Buzelis provided a spark off the bench:
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 15 |
| FG | 6-13 (46.2%) |
| 3PT | 3-7 (42.9%) |
| Rebounds | 8 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Blocks | 2 |
The second-year forward continues developing his all-around game, showing flashes of the potential that made him the 11th overall pick in 2024.
Collin Sexton attacked the basket relentlessly:
| Category | Stats |
|---|---|
| Points | 15 |
| FG | 6-13 (46.2%) |
| 3PT | 1-4 (25.0%) |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Steals | 2 |
Complete Boston Celtics Box Score
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaylen Brown | 32 | 24 | 9-20 | 2-9 | 4-4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Payton Pritchard | 31 | 26 | 11-18 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Nikola Vucevic | 28 | 19 | 7-12 | 4-5 | 1-2 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Jordan Walsh | 24 | 16 | 7-12 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Sam Hauser | 20 | 12 | 4-9 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Baylor Scheierman | 18 | 10 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Derrick White | 27 | 9 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Neemias Queta | 16 | 8 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Complete Chicago Bulls Box Score
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rob Dillingham | 32 | 16 | 6-12 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Matas Buzelis | 29 | 15 | 6-13 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Collin Sexton | 28 | 15 | 6-13 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Guerschon Yabusele | 24 | 13 | 5-12 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Williams | 26 | 12 | 5-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Jaden Ivey | 22 | 10 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Anfernee Simons | 20 | 7 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Lachlan Olbrich | 12 | 7 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Team Statistics Comparison
Shooting Efficiency
| Category | Bulls | Celtics |
|---|---|---|
| FG% | 46.1% | 51.6% |
| 3PT% | 33.3% | 40.0% |
| FT% | 84.6% | 61.5% |
| eFG% | 52.8% | 61.1% |
| TS% | 55.4% | 61.6% |
Boston’s superior shooting efficiency proved decisive. The Celtics converted at a higher rate from every level, particularly from three-point range where they attempted 45 shots and knocked down 18.
Rebounding Battle
| Category | Bulls | Celtics |
|---|---|---|
| Offensive Rebounds | 9 | 13 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 25 | 35 |
| Total Rebounds | 41 | 61 |
The Celtics dominated the glass, grabbing 20 more total rebounds. This disparity created additional possessions and second-chance opportunities that Chicago couldn’t overcome.
Ball Movement and Defense
| Category | Bulls | Celtics |
|---|---|---|
| Assists | 25 | 29 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 14 |
| Steals | 9 | 9 |
| Blocks | 5 | 8 |
| Points in Paint | 44 | 52 |
| Fast Break Points | 11 | 12 |
| Bench Points | 43 | 61 |
Boston’s bench outscored Chicago’s reserves 61-43, showcasing the depth advantage the Celtics possess. The home team also scored more efficiently inside the paint despite both teams attacking the basket frequently.
Advanced Metrics
| Category | Bulls | Celtics |
|---|---|---|
| Offensive Rating | 106.4 | 121.9 |
| Defensive Rating | 121.9 | 106.4 |
| Pace (Possessions) | 98.7 | 101.7 |
| Biggest Lead | 5 | 33 |
The advanced numbers paint a clear picture. Boston’s offensive rating of 121.9 points per 100 possessions dominated Chicago’s 106.4 mark. The Celtics built their lead as high as 33 points in the second half before the Bulls’ bench mob made the final margin more respectable.
Key Storylines and Context
The Vucevic-Simons Swap Takes Center Stage
The trade deadline deal that sent Vucevic to Boston and Simons to Chicago added significant intrigue to this matchup. Vucevic showed off everything, shooting the ball well, running the pick-and-roll beautifully, and acting as an impressive connector, finding wide-open shooters time and time again.
Meanwhile, Simons finished with seven points, marking his first time being under 15 in his four consecutive starts for the Bulls. The contrast in performances couldn’t have been starker.
Bulls’ Injury Crisis Deepens
The Bulls played without Isaac Okoro (knee), who joined what was already a lengthy Bulls injury list. Josh Giddey has been out since Jan. 28 when he aggravated a hamstring injury, and Tre Jones also has been dealing with a hamstring issue that’s kept him sidelined since Jan. 22.
The depleted roster forced Chicago to lean heavily on its remaining rotation players, but the depth simply wasn’t there to compete with a relatively healthy Boston squad.
Celtics’ Second Quarter Surge
The Celtics carried a 28-point lead into halftime, taking advantage of a Chicago team that was missing several top contributors. Boston’s lead rose as high as 33 in the second half.
At one point, Jaden Ivey scored on Pritchard and was smiling while getting back on defense. So, Pritchard dribbled right at him, sped up, stepped back, and drilled a three in his face. That sequence epitomized Boston’s confidence and execution.
All-Star Break Timing
This game served as the finale before the All-Star break for both franchises. The Celtics head into the break on a high note, winners of six of their last seven. The Bulls, conversely, have lost six straight and desperately need the break to get healthy and regroup.
Tactical Analysis
Boston’s Three-Point Barrage
The Celtics attempted 45 three-pointers and made 18 at a 40% clip. This volume shooting approach stretched Chicago’s defense to the breaking point. With players like Pritchard, Brown, Vucevic, and Hauser all capable of knocking down triples, the Bulls couldn’t pack the paint without consequences.
Sam Hauser exemplified this strategy, going 4-for-7 from deep without attempting a single two-point field goal. The modern basketball approach allowed Boston to generate high-value shots throughout the contest.
Chicago’s Paint Presence Without Impact
Despite scoring 44 points in the paint compared to Boston’s 52, the Bulls couldn’t capitalize on their interior opportunities. Converting at just 56.4% on paint attempts versus the Celtics’ 61.9% highlighted Chicago’s struggles finishing at the rim against Boston’s length and rim protection.
The Bulls’ 63.6% shooting at the rim (7-for-11) sounds efficient, but the limited volume exposed their inability to consistently get to the basket against Boston’s defense.
Pick-and-Roll Domination
Vucevic’s ability to execute high-level pick-and-roll actions tormented his former team. Chicago didn’t have anyone on its roster capable of checking Vucevic in the post. So, he ripped them to shreds with a steady diet of post hooks, slick kick-out passes, and tough screens.
The big man’s court vision (three assists) doesn’t fully capture his impact as a facilitator. His screening freed up perimeter shooters repeatedly, and his ability to pop out for threes (4-for-5) made him virtually unguardable in this matchup.
Defensive Breakdowns Plague Chicago
The Bulls’ defensive rating of 121.9 tells the story of a unit that couldn’t generate stops. Boston shot 51.6% from the field overall and posted an effective field goal percentage of 61.1% when accounting for the value of three-pointers.
Chicago’s switching schemes broke down against Boston’s movement and screening. The Celtics’ 29 assists on 49 field goals demonstrated patient, efficient offense that consistently found the open man.
Historical Context and Records
Season Standings Impact
The victory improved Boston to 35-19 on the season, keeping them in the hunt for a top-two seed in the Eastern Conference. The loss dropped Chicago to 24-31, further dimming their already faint playoff hopes.
The 19-point margin represents Boston’s third-largest victory over Chicago in the 2025-26 season. The Celtics have now won the season series decisively.
Individual Milestones
Payton Pritchard’s 26-point explosion marked his highest-scoring game in nearly a month. His efficiency (11-for-18 shooting) showcased the instant offense he provides off the bench.
Vucevic’s double-double in just his third game as a Celtic suggests he’s adapting quickly to Boston’s system. His four three-pointers matched a season-high for any single game this year.
Looking Ahead
Bulls’ Difficult Road
Chicago’s six-game losing streak heading into the All-Star break raises serious questions about the team’s direction. The combination of injuries and roster turnover has created instability that won’t resolve quickly.
The Bulls host Toronto on February 19 when play resumes. Getting healthy during the break becomes paramount for any hope of salvaging a playoff push in the season’s second half.
Celtics’ Championship Aspirations
Boston’s dominant performance reinforces their status as legitimate title contenders. The Vucevic addition provides another dimension to an already potent offense, and the team’s depth continues to shine through.
The Celtics travel to face Golden State on February 19, a marquee matchup that will test how well their new-look roster performs against elite competition.
Final Thoughts
The chicago bulls vs boston celtics match player stats from February 11, 2026 revealed a mismatch between a team hitting its stride and one struggling through adversity. Boston’s 124-105 victory was never in doubt after the first half, with Payton Pritchard’s 26 points and Nikola Vucevic’s revenge game double-double highlighting the Celtics’ balanced attack.
For those tracking team performance and individual stats throughout the season, comprehensive player data and game analysis can be found at Match vs Player Stats.
Chicago’s depleted roster simply couldn’t match Boston’s firepower or depth. The 19-point final margin actually flatters the Bulls, as the Celtics’ lead reached 33 points before the reserves played extended minutes in garbage time.
As both teams head into the All-Star break, their trajectories couldn’t be more different. Boston enters the break as one of the East’s most dangerous teams, while Chicago faces difficult decisions about their future direction. This game encapsulated those divergent paths perfectly, with the chicago bulls vs boston celtics match player stats telling a story of dominance meeting desperation.
